Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-208642-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:17:44 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com>,
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Th=E9o?= Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for the Mobileye EyeQ6H SoC
Message-ID: <ZmcZGC0Q91rd6uSI@alpha.franken.de>
References: <20240513-eyeq6h-v2-0-ae8c1974b52b@bootlin.com>
 <87zfrsetws.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87zfrsetws.fsf@BLaptop.bootlin.com>

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 04:47:47PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > Following the support of the EyeQ5 SoC, this series adds the initial
> > support for a newer SoC, the EyeQ6H.
> >
> > The EyeQ6H (or "High") from Mobileye is still based on the MIPS I6500
> > architecture as the EyeQ5. The 2 clusters of this SoC contain 4 cores
> > each, which are capable of running 4 threads per core. Besides this,
> > it features multiple controllers such as the classic UART, high-speed
> > I2C, SPI, as well as CAN-FD, PCIe Gen4, Octal/Quad SPI Flash
> > interface, Gigabit Ethernet, MIPI CSI-2, MIPI DSI, and eMMC 5.1. It
> > also includes a Hardware Security Module, Functional Safety Hardware,
> > and video encoders, among other features.
> >
> > For now, this series just adds initial support with UART and Pinctrl
> > support. Another current limitation pointed out in patch 3 is that
> > only one CPU is actually running. This limitation will be solved with
> > upcoming series.
> >
> > The main change in this new version is the use of the new way to name
> > the clock nodes.
> 
> I sent this second version a month ago and the first version even before
> that, and I still haven't received any feedback from your side. Does it
> mean that you will merge it?

I will this week. The second version came around merge window, so I didn't
want to include it.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]