Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-208935-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>, 
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, 
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, 
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, 
 Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 
 linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20240610-md-drivers-regulator-v2-1-cf39106d7e54@quicinc.com>
References: <20240610-md-drivers-regulator-v2-1-cf39106d7e54@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
Message-Id: <171805587951.166318.13582723419199956307.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:44:39 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:30:51 -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On x86, make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/da9121-regulator.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/max20411-regulator.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/rt4831-regulator.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/regulator/tps6286x-regulator.o
> 
> Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro
      commit: 8a2744f2955a584188a82d631937aa365d4ea966

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark