Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-209283-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:31:51 -0700
From: Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>,
	Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@intel.com>,
	Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com>,
	Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@microsoft.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>,
	Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: mana: Allow variable size indirection
 table
Message-ID: <20240611053151.GA7510@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
References: <1717169861-15825-1-git-send-email-shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20240604093349.GP491852@kernel.org>
 <20240605083906.GA15889@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
 <20240606163334.GO791188@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240606163334.GO791188@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 05:33:34PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 01:39:06AM -0700, Shradha Gupta wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 10:33:49AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:37:41AM -0700, Shradha Gupta wrote:
> > > > Allow variable size indirection table allocation in MANA instead
> > > > of using a constant value MANA_INDIRECT_TABLE_SIZE.
> > > > The size is now derived from the MANA_QUERY_VPORT_CONFIG and the
> > > > indirection table is allocated dynamically.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@linux.microsoft.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > @@ -2344,11 +2352,33 @@ static int mana_create_vport(struct mana_port_context *apc,
> > > >  	return mana_create_txq(apc, net);
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > +static int mana_rss_table_alloc(struct mana_port_context *apc)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	if (!apc->indir_table_sz) {
> > > > +		netdev_err(apc->ndev,
> > > > +			   "Indirection table size not set for vPort %d\n",
> > > > +			   apc->port_idx);
> > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	apc->indir_table = kcalloc(apc->indir_table_sz, sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +	if (!apc->indir_table)
> > > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > +	apc->rxobj_table = kcalloc(apc->indir_table_sz, sizeof(mana_handle_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +	if (!apc->rxobj_table) {
> > > > +		kfree(apc->indir_table);
> > > 
> > > Hi, Shradha
> > > 
> > > Perhaps I am on the wrong track here, but I have some concerns
> > > about clean-up paths.
> > > 
> > > Firstly.  I think that apc->indir_table should be to NULL here for
> > > consistency with other clean-up paths. Or alternatively, fields of apc
> > > should not set to NULL elsewhere after being freed.
> > 
> > Hi Simon,
> > 
> > Thanks for the comments. This makes sense, I am planning of consistently
> > removing the NULLify from other places too as per Leon's comments.
> 
> Great!
> 
> > > In looking into this I noticed that mana_probe() does not call
> > > mana_remove() or return an error in the cases where mana_probe_port()
> > > or mana_attach() fail unless add_adev also fails. If so, is that
> > > intentional?
> > 
> > Right, so most calls like mana_probe_port(), mana_attach() cleanup after
> > themselves in the code if there is any error. So, not having to call
> > mana_remove() in these cases in mana_probe() is intentional. But I do
> > agree that an error is returned in mana_probe() only if add_adev also
> > fails. I'll fix that too in the next version
> 
> I'm not entirely sure, but perhaps that is a candidate for a separate patch.
> 
> > > 
> > > In any case, I would suggest as a follow-up, arranging things so that
> > > when an error occurs in a function, anything that was allocated is
> > > unwound before returning an error.
> > > 
> > > I think this would make allocation/deallocation easier to reason with.
> > > And I suspect it would avoid both the need for fields of structures to
> > > be zeroed after being freed, and the need to call mana_remove() from
> > > mana_probe().
> > 
> > Agreed
> > > 
> > > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  static void mana_rss_table_init(struct mana_port_context *apc)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	int i;
> > > >  
> > > > -	for (i = 0; i < MANA_INDIRECT_TABLE_SIZE; i++)
> > > > +	for (i = 0; i < apc->indir_table_sz; i++)
> > > >  		apc->indir_table[i] =
> > > >  			ethtool_rxfh_indir_default(i, apc->num_queues);
> > > >  }
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > @@ -2739,11 +2772,17 @@ static int mana_probe_port(struct mana_context *ac, int port_idx,
> > > >  	err = register_netdev(ndev);
> > > >  	if (err) {
> > > >  		netdev_err(ndev, "Unable to register netdev.\n");
> > > > -		goto reset_apc;
> > > > +		goto free_indir;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >  
> > > > +free_indir:
> > > > +	apc->indir_table_sz = 0;
> > > > +	kfree(apc->indir_table);
> > > > +	apc->indir_table = NULL;
> > > > +	kfree(apc->rxobj_table);
> > > > +	apc->rxobj_table = NULL;
> > > >  reset_apc:
> > > >  	kfree(apc->rxqs);
> > > >  	apc->rxqs = NULL;
> > > 
> > > nit: Not strictly related to this patch, but the reset_apc code should
> > >      probably be a call to mana_cleanup_port_context() as it is the dual of
> > >      mana_init_port_context() which is called earlier in mana_probe_port()
> > 
> > Sure, let me do that too.
> 
> FWIIW, I think it would be appropriate to put that change in a separate patch.
Fixing this and other similar changes in a different patch. Thanks
> 
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > @@ -2931,6 +2972,11 @@ void mana_remove(struct gdma_dev *gd, bool suspending)
> > > >  		}
> > > >  
> > > >  		unregister_netdevice(ndev);
> > > > +		apc->indir_table_sz = 0;
> > > > +		kfree(apc->indir_table);
> > > > +		apc->indir_table = NULL;
> > > > +		kfree(apc->rxobj_table);
> > > > +		apc->rxobj_table = NULL;
> > > 
> > > The code to free and zero indir_table_sz and indir_table appears twice
> > > in this patch. Perhaps a helper to do this, which would be the dual
> > > of mana_rss_table_alloc is in order.
> > Makes sense, will change this too.
> 
> Thanks.