Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761422AbYBFWtW (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:49:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757633AbYBFWtO (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:49:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:50989 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750988AbYBFWtN (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:49:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:48:05 -0500 From: Vivek Goyal To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Neil Horman , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH], issue EOI to APIC prior to calling crash_kexec in die_nmi path Message-ID: <20080206224805.GD11886@redhat.com> References: <20080206192555.GA24910@hmsendeavour.rdu.redhat.com> <20080206220001.GA15155@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080206220001.GA15155@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1348 Lines: 37 On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:00:01PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Neil Horman wrote: > > > if (!user_mode_vm(regs)) { > > + nmi_exit(); > > + local_irq_enable(); > > current->thread.trap_no = 2; > > crash_kexec(regs); > > looks good to me, but please move the local_irq_enable() to within > crash_kexec() instead - probably inside the "got the kexec lock" > section. That makes crash_kexec() use generally safer too i guess: right > it seems that die() too can call crash_kexec() with irqs disabled - and > can thus hang in smp_send_stop() [or wherever it hung before]. > In general, I think we should not be servicing interrupts once the system has crashed and crash_kexec() has been invoked. In fact, right now machine_crash_shutdown() explicity disables interrupt before sending NMIs to other cpus to stop these cpus and which makes sense to me. I am wondering if interrupts are disabled on crashing cpu or if crashing cpu is inside die_nmi(), how would it stop/prevent delivery of NMI IPI to other cpus. Am I missing something obivious? Thanks Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/