Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-209681-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:52:45 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Rui Zhou <zhourui@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
	trevor.wu@mediatek.com, allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com,
	kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com, maso.huang@mediatek.com,
	linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ASoC:  support machine driver with TAS2781
Message-ID: <Zmgsfafmfedd9_MV@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
References: <20240611022227.2508354-1-zhourui@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K85sZsmQcdfrCDzv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240611022227.2508354-1-zhourui@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>


--K85sZsmQcdfrCDzv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:22:27AM +0800, Rui Zhou wrote:
> Support amp TAS2781 for mt8188 platform
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Rui Zhou <zhourui@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>=20
> diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig b/sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> index 5a8476e1ecca..07f67f96c889 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ config SND_SOC_MT8188_MT6359
>  	select SND_SOC_HDMI_CODEC
>  	select SND_SOC_DMIC
>  	select SND_SOC_MAX98390
> +	select SND_SOC_TAS2781_I2C
>  	select SND_SOC_NAU8315
>  	select SND_SOC_NAU8825

Ideally this would be sorted to avoid spurious merge conficts.  Also do
we really have dependencies here or should these just be being enabled
by users - these drivers are all pretty generic now?  Not that this
change in itself makes a huge difference to the existing state.

--K85sZsmQcdfrCDzv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmZoLHwACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9AAVgf/TWEQisVxEaf1frM1/D3qcobxJ6efWsgIv3IU+Pg4hw/ZG/TRDwKrGkj3
htAD+n9XXY85OzGfILsjRExZ+WDaULAYnvBoJpml5QqvJPQJ3hdFVeAP+oyZ3uwa
ueaNc253irzMPAtO6FUe4KrJSLXGWTWfiliOS3p6ntj8HuuLO0IaXw2r/9Qedf2l
HLVobEfd4G0nC68K75qt0El0Dl+8vJMKa4NHL75A1Zdj0WHBNC5pbCB1q1SNIKWB
xpWuo7HPpof5ewkH4wE/ej3Ug25R0yw6UbMUSl2GVkAqY4n7nF2GKoO7O3uZ+yvG
HGdLYOln52AYmZDRc1mkwDvKazuvwA==
=rSC4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--K85sZsmQcdfrCDzv--