Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-210693-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240103164841.2800183-1-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
 <htpurelstaqpswf5nkhtttm3vtbvga7qazs2estwzf2srmg65x@banbo2c5ewzw>
 <20240611124807.aedaa473507150bd65e63426@linux-foundation.org> <mpshgxmd3c3gpxltlvquw7zvhq5rvukcws55yo7womgogjxu7q@4p7dr66ctwxh>
In-Reply-To: <mpshgxmd3c3gpxltlvquw7zvhq5rvukcws55yo7womgogjxu7q@4p7dr66ctwxh>
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:10:12 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOUHufafhx+3QE1CSQpctOm8NjQRuHLT+jyK=mf7c2dgFAn4+g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add swappiness argument to memory.reclaim
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Yue Zhao <findns94@gmail.com>, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, 
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>, 
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, 
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>, 
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, 
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, 
	Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, 
	Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 4:50=E2=80=AFPM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.de=
v> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 12:48:07PM GMT, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:25:24 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev=
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > This series has been in the mm-unstable for several months. Are there
> > > any remaining concerns here otherwise can we please put this in the
> > > mm-stable branch to be merged in the next Linux release?
> >
> > The review didn't go terribly well so I parked the series awaiting more
> > clarity.  Although on rereading, it seems that Yu Zhao isn't seeing any
> > blocking issues?
> >
>
> Yu, please share if you have any strong concern in merging this series?

I don't remember I had any strong concerns. In fact, I don't remember
what I commented on.

Let me go back to the previous discussion and see why it was stalled.
Will get back to you soon.