Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934458AbYBGAej (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:34:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764751AbYBGABS (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:01:18 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43088 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760633AbYBGABR (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:01:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:01:47 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20080206.160147.25411834.davem@davemloft.net> To: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp Cc: tomof@acm.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: more iommu sg merging fallout From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20080207085333Q.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> References: <20080207081236V.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080206.151855.136436571.davem@davemloft.net> <20080207085333Q.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1493 Lines: 33 From: FUJITA Tomonori Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:53:33 +0900 > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:18:55 -0800 (PST) > David Miller wrote: > > > I intend to put merging back in, perhaps something similar to > > powerpc's merging logic but without the expensive (in my opinion) > > IOMMU allocation every loop. I think it is better to determine the > > segment breaks in one pass, allocate that many IOMMU entries in one > > allocation, then fill them all in. > > I thought about asking you if I can modify the SPARC IOMMUs to do > allocation in every loop. > > The reason why I need the allocation in every loop is that I also need > to fix the problem that IOMMUs allocate memory areas without > considering a low level driver's segment boundary limits. > > http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2007-11/msg07616.html > http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2007-12/msg02286.html > > As far as I know, all the IOMMUs except for SPARC allocate a free area > in every loop but if it's too expensive for SPARC, then we need to > find a different way to handle segment boundary limits. Ok then what I'll do is adopt some version of powerpc's merging allocator into the sparc64 code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/