Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934142AbYBGAjk (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:39:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765025AbYBGAJm (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:09:42 -0500 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:48123 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765254AbYBGAJk (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:09:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:07:45 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Andrew Morton Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kay.sievers@vrfy.org Subject: Re: partition sysfs OOPS in current GIT Message-ID: <20080207000745.GB16389@suse.de> References: <20080206.152639.35541094.davem@davemloft.net> <20080206233117.GA28931@suse.de> <20080206155749.ce1fcd25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080206155749.ce1fcd25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1699 Lines: 43 On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 03:57:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > How is it working for anyone else then? sparc64 isn't doing anything > > "odd" with it's block devices, is it? > > > > > I'm pretty sure the following changeset is to blame: > > > > > > commit edfaa7c36574f1bf09c65ad602412db9da5f96bf > > > Author: Kay Sievers > > > Date: Mon May 21 22:08:01 2007 +0200 > > > > > > Driver core: convert block from raw kobjects to core devices > > > > > > This moves the block devices to /sys/class/block. It will create a > > > flat list of all block devices, with the disks and partitions in one > > > directory. For compatibility /sys/block is created and contains symlinks > > > to the disks. > > > > So I'm guessing if you revert this it works? > > Going offtopic here... > > The patch was committed to mainline last week and it has a git timestamp > from eight months ago. When you received the original email from Kay. > > But the patch changed in that time period. This doesn't seem right? The patch did change over time, but not that much, minor bugfixes for it. I didn't think to update the original date in the quilt file, sorry. It was in -mm for quite a while, so I thought it got a good enough testing period. I'll try to remember to update the timestamp on patches that get updated, it's a pretty rare thing for my patchflow, shouldn't be hard to remember. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/