Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id <S129150AbQKVT5R>; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:57:17 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
        id <S129688AbQKVT5H>; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:57:07 -0500
Received: from cx425802-a.blvue1.ne.home.com ([24.0.54.216]:21000 "EHLO
        wr5z.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S129150AbQKVT46>;
        Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:56:58 -0500
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 13:26:50 -0600 (CST)
From: Thomas Molina <tmolina@home.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Announce: modutils 2.3.21 is available
In-Reply-To: <3A1C19E6.D9000430@linux.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0011221325070.4614-100000@wr5z.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, David Ford wrote:

> > >       * Remove compile warnings in xstrcat.
> > >       * snprintf cleanups.
> > >       * Set safemode when uid != euid.
> > >       * Strip quotes from shell responses.
> >         + add RedHat ism's with a --rhc (red hat compatible) -i -m (-F)
> >
> > RedHat kind of is the standard in the commercial world in the US.
>
> I don't think it's necessary or appropriate to taylor things for a particular
> distribution even if it may unfortunately be 'standard' for some people.

Zackerly.  My system will certainly look like a RedHat system; it's
based on one.  However (particularly with regards to kernels and
modules), I can almost guarantee it won't react like a RedHat system.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/