Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-211180-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
	Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 1/3] memory: fsl_ifc: Make FSL_IFC config visible and selectable
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:26:14 +0200
Message-ID: <171818062457.17232.8716946182820856760.b4-ty@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240530-fsl-ifc-config-v3-1-1fd2c3d233dd@geanix.com>
References: <20240530-fsl-ifc-config-v3-0-1fd2c3d233dd@geanix.com> <20240530-fsl-ifc-config-v3-1-1fd2c3d233dd@geanix.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


On Thu, 30 May 2024 16:46:36 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> While use of fsl_ifc driver with NAND flash is fine, as the fsl_ifc_nand
> driver selects FSL_IFC automatically, we need the CONFIG_FSL_IFC option to
> be selectable for platforms using fsl_ifc with NOR flash.
> 
> 

Applied first patch only, because:
1. I did not get acks for the defconfigs,
2. I do not consider stable defconfig as a hard-bisectability requirment, thus
it can break within one release as long as next is not affected.

The last statement is kind of not true, because next is now affected, so,
Esben, I think you should resend the defconfigs to respective platform
maintainers. To recall: arm64 goes via your SoC subarch/platform maintainers,
not arm64 maintainers.

Applied, thanks!

[1/3] memory: fsl_ifc: Make FSL_IFC config visible and selectable
      https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux-mem-ctrl/c/9ba0cae3cac07c21c583f9ff194f74043f90d29c

Best regards,
-- 
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>