Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 05:04:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 05:03:57 -0500 Received: from mail.loewe-komp.de ([62.156.155.230]:57607 "EHLO mail.loewe-komp.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 05:03:43 -0500 Message-ID: <3C3972D4.56F4A1E2@loewe-komp.de> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 11:05:08 +0100 From: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=E4chtler?= Organization: LOEWE. Hannover X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.16 i686) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml , velco@fadata.bg Subject: Re: [PATCH] updated version of radix-tree pagecache In-Reply-To: <20020105171234.A25383@caldera.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig schrieb: > > [please Cc velco@fadata.bg and lkml on reply] > > I've just uploaded an updated version of Momchil Velikov's patch for a > scalable pagecache using radix trees. The patch can be found at: > > It contains a number of fixed and improvements by Momchil and me. > Can you sum up the advantages of this implementation? I think it scales better on "big systems" where otherwise you end up with many pages on the same hash? Is it beneficial for small systems? (I think not) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/