Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:38:03 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kay.sievers@vrfy.org
Subject: Re: partition sysfs OOPS in current GIT
Message-ID: <20080207063803.GA22563@suse.de>
References: <20080207000959.GA16601@suse.de> <20080206.200618.11213859.davem@davemloft.net> <20080207054738.GB20902@suse.de> <20080206.220544.238067538.davem@davemloft.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080206.220544.238067538.davem@davemloft.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1182
Lines: 33

On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:05:44PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:47:38 -0800
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:06:18PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > I redid the bisect to make sure it absolutely was that specific
> > > changeset, and it is.
> > 
> > Thanks for doing that, I'll let you know when I have a patch to test.
> 
> I found the problem, it's the "whole_disk" partition attribute.
> 
> Look in fs/partitions/check.c:add_partition() where it tests the
> ADDPART_FLAG_WHOLEDISK flag.
> 
> I think that code block needs to be updated to match the rest of the
> changes in the offending changeset we are discussing.

Ah, great catch.  That code just looks wrong.

I'm guessing that you have a partition that is the whole disk?  That
would make sense why I and most others haven't seen this yet.

I'll make up a patch...

thanks a lot for still digging into this,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/