Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-211867-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:05:14 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>,
	Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] usercopy: Convert test_user_copy to KUnit test
Message-ID: <202406120903.D0EF1C6@keescook>
References: <20240610213055.it.075-kees@kernel.org>
 <20240610213330.1310156-2-kees@kernel.org>
 <CABVgOSmFL50_qYOBROkE9LZx__W6MLnHWahGnAVuLBDVO4k1zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABVgOSmFL50_qYOBROkE9LZx__W6MLnHWahGnAVuLBDVO4k1zQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 05:13:39PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 05:33, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Convert the runtime tests of hardened usercopy to standard KUnit tests.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721174654.72132-1-vitor@massaru.org
> > Tested-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
> > ---
> 
> This looks good, particularly with the x86 fix applied.

Thanks!

> It's still hanging on m68k -- I think at the 'illegal reversed
> copy_to_user passed' test -- but I'll admit to not having tried to
> debug it further.

For my own future reference, I have reproduced this with:

$ sudo apt install gcc-m68k-linux-gnu
$ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch m68k --make_option CROSS_COMPILE=m68k-linux-gnu- usercopy

I'll figure it out...

> One other (set of) notes below about using KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG(),
> otherwise (assuming the m68k stuff isn't actually a regression, which
> I haven't tested but I imagine is unlikely),

I should really read all the API docs every few releases. :) I will
switch to KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG!

-- 
Kees Cook