Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-212021-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:44:32 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@linux.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, dvhart@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
	andrealmeid@igalia.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	urezki@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org, lstoakes@gmail.com,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	malteskarupke@web.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/14] futex: Implement FUTEX2_NUMA
Message-ID: <20240612174432.GK8774@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20230721102237.268073801@infradead.org>
 <20230721105744.434742902@infradead.org>
 <9dc04e4c-2adc-5084-4ea1-b200d82be29f@linux.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9dc04e4c-2adc-5084-4ea1-b200d82be29f@linux.com>

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:23:00AM -0700, Christoph Lameter (Ampere) wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Extend the futex2 interface to be numa aware.
> 
> Sorry to be chiming in that late but it seems that this is useful to
> mitigate NUMA issues also for our platform.

I read this like: I tested it and it works for me. Is that a correct
reading of your statement?

If so, I'll look at bumping this on the priority list and I'll look at
the placement suggestion you had when I respin the patches.

Thanks!