Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-212907-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	djwong@kernel.org,
	hch@infradead.org,
	brauner@kernel.org,
	david@fromorbit.com,
	chandanbabu@kernel.org,
	jack@suse.cz,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com,
	chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
	yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH -next v5 8/8] iomap: don't increase i_size in iomap_write_end()
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:00:33 +0800
Message-Id: <20240613090033.2246907-9-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240613090033.2246907-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
References: <20240613090033.2246907-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

This reverts commit '0841ea4a3b41 ("iomap: keep on increasing i_size in
iomap_write_end()")'.

After xfs could zero out the tail blocks aligned to the allocation
unitsize and convert the tail blocks to unwritten for realtime inode on
truncate down, it couldn't expose any stale data when unaligned truncate
down realtime inodes, so we could keep on stop increasing i_size for
IOMAP_UNSHARE and IOMAP_ZERO in iomap_write_end().

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 4a23c3950a47..75360128f1da 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -891,37 +891,22 @@ static bool iomap_write_end(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos, size_t len,
 		size_t copied, struct folio *folio)
 {
 	const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
-	loff_t old_size = iter->inode->i_size;
-	size_t written;
 
 	if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_INLINE) {
 		iomap_write_end_inline(iter, folio, pos, copied);
-		written = copied;
-	} else if (srcmap->flags & IOMAP_F_BUFFER_HEAD) {
-		written = block_write_end(NULL, iter->inode->i_mapping, pos,
-					len, copied, &folio->page, NULL);
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(written != copied && written != 0);
-	} else {
-		written = __iomap_write_end(iter->inode, pos, len, copied,
-					    folio) ? copied : 0;
+		return true;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Update the in-memory inode size after copying the data into the page
-	 * cache.  It's up to the file system to write the updated size to disk,
-	 * preferably after I/O completion so that no stale data is exposed.
-	 * Only once that's done can we unlock and release the folio.
-	 */
-	if (pos + written > old_size) {
-		i_size_write(iter->inode, pos + written);
-		iter->iomap.flags |= IOMAP_F_SIZE_CHANGED;
-	}
-	__iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, written, folio);
+	if (srcmap->flags & IOMAP_F_BUFFER_HEAD) {
+		size_t bh_written;
 
-	if (old_size < pos)
-		pagecache_isize_extended(iter->inode, old_size, pos);
+		bh_written = block_write_end(NULL, iter->inode->i_mapping, pos,
+					len, copied, &folio->page, NULL);
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(bh_written != copied && bh_written != 0);
+		return bh_written == copied;
+	}
 
-	return written == copied;
+	return __iomap_write_end(iter->inode, pos, len, copied, folio);
 }
 
 static loff_t iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i)
@@ -936,6 +921,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i)
 
 	do {
 		struct folio *folio;
+		loff_t old_size;
 		size_t offset;		/* Offset into folio */
 		size_t bytes;		/* Bytes to write to folio */
 		size_t copied;		/* Bytes copied from user */
@@ -987,6 +973,23 @@ static loff_t iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i)
 		written = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, copied, folio) ?
 			  copied : 0;
 
+		/*
+		 * Update the in-memory inode size after copying the data into
+		 * the page cache.  It's up to the file system to write the
+		 * updated size to disk, preferably after I/O completion so that
+		 * no stale data is exposed.  Only once that's done can we
+		 * unlock and release the folio.
+		 */
+		old_size = iter->inode->i_size;
+		if (pos + written > old_size) {
+			i_size_write(iter->inode, pos + written);
+			iter->iomap.flags |= IOMAP_F_SIZE_CHANGED;
+		}
+		__iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, written, folio);
+
+		if (old_size < pos)
+			pagecache_isize_extended(iter->inode, old_size, pos);
+
 		cond_resched();
 		if (unlikely(written == 0)) {
 			/*
@@ -1357,6 +1360,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_unshare_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter)
 			bytes = folio_size(folio) - offset;
 
 		ret = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, bytes, folio);
+		__iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, bytes, folio);
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret))
 			return -EIO;
 
@@ -1422,6 +1426,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
 		folio_mark_accessed(folio);
 
 		ret = iomap_write_end(iter, pos, bytes, bytes, folio);
+		__iomap_put_folio(iter, pos, bytes, folio);
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret))
 			return -EIO;
 
-- 
2.39.2