Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932518AbYBGPFL (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:05:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756272AbYBGPEe (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:04:34 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:56133 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756163AbYBGPEc (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:04:32 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:58:17 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: David Newall Cc: Diego Zuccato , Greg KH , Christer Weinigel , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only Message-ID: <20080207145817.181481e9@core> In-Reply-To: <47AB1A3E.3040703@davidnewall.com> References: <20080125180232.GA4613@kroah.com> <20080202123710.42df1aa0@weinigel.se> <20080202191930.GA19826@kroah.com> <47A5D895.20300@davidnewall.com> <47A6E742.80408@otello.alma.unibo.it> <20080205232550.5d3d22ff@core> <47AB0101.2050204@davidnewall.com> <20080207141030.78958c29@core> <47AB1A3E.3040703@davidnewall.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2077 Lines: 46 > That's what you claim it says, but has any court, anywhere, agreed with > you? You claim the authority of others (i.e. numerous lawyers), but I > don't believe you have that authority. You're just starting hearsay. > You've never said what lawyers and you've never told us what they > actually said. That would be improper as you'd well know if you knew the first thing about the subject. > > I see that you have a clear political agenda, and I respect it in > principle, but you're claiming that things are so in pursuit of that > agenda when you don't *know* that they are. You don't need to stretch > any truths to spread adoption of GPL, and doing so is not respectable. Why don't you just say "you are a liar" as I assume that is what you want to say. Then I have to read less words before I find you funny. > I don't understand this, but I do understand that an essential question > being considered is whether or not Linux can participate in a market > that prohibits GPL drivers, whether explicitly, or more likely through > pressure from regulatory bodies. Doing this would be a mistake. > Probably a big one. Linux is GPL licencesed code you either follow the licence or don't use it. It's very simple. > > Don't telling people to switch to BSD, as some have done; they might do > it. Where would Linux be if embedded devices used BSD instead? Don't I don't actually care. If you want to do binary products then pick a product you have the right to do that with. > think they can't. Don't think Linux has a technical advantage. Lose > the embedded market, and that's where it would be felt first, and Linux > volumes fall by what? 50%? 90%? Would you care if servers followed? The market will ultimately decide which models of software development are the right ones for which situation. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/