Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-213987-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:18:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>, Christoph Hellwig
 <hch@infradead.org>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>, Baoquan He
 <bhe@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, hailong liu
 <hailong.liu@oppo.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 stable@vger.kernel.org, Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>,
 steve.kang@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [Resend PATCHv4 1/1] mm: fix incorrect vbq reference in
 purge_fragmented_block
Message-Id: <20240613131853.814a40233d36d57f868f9a39@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZmstXFYq6iSHYdtR@pc636>
References: <20240607023116.1720640-1-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
	<ZmstXFYq6iSHYdtR@pc636>
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 19:33:16 +0200 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:

> > 2.25.1
> > 
> Yes there is a mess with holding wrong vbq->lock and vmap_blocks xarray.
> 
> The patch looks good to me. One small nit from my side is a commit
> message. To me it is vague and it should be improved.
> 
> Could you please use Hailong.Liu <hailong.liu@oppo.com> explanation
> of the issue and resend the patch?
> 
> See it here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/6/2/2
> 
> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

Thanks, I'll queue this (with a cc:stable) for testing and shall await
the updated changelog.