Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932462AbYBGR20 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:28:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756655AbYBGR2R (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:28:17 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:46332 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753873AbYBGR2Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:28:16 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,316,1199692800"; d="scan'208";a="257017985" Message-ID: <47AB3EEF.6050005@intel.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:25:03 -0800 From: "Kok, Auke" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max Krasnyansky CC: Pavel Machek , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, kernel list , john.ronciak@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem References: <20080207141718.GA2030@elf.ucw.cz> <47AB38AB.8050001@qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <47AB38AB.8050001@qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2036 Lines: 52 Max Krasnyansky wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I have the famous e1000 latency problems: >> >> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms >> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms >> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms >> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=71 ttl=56 time=308.9 ms >> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=72 ttl=56 time=305.4 ms >> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=73 ttl=56 time=9.8 ms >> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=74 ttl=56 time=3.7 ms >> >> ...and they are still there in 2.6.25-git0. I had ethernet EEPROM >> checksum problems, which I fixed by the update, but problems are not >> gone. >> >> irqpoll helps. >> >> nosmp (which implies XT-PIC is being used) does not help. >> >> 16: 1925 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ahci, yenta, uhci_hcd:usb2, eth0 >> >> Booting kernel with nosmp/ no yenta, no usb does not help. >> >> Hmm, as expected, interrupt load on ahci (find /) makes latencies go >> away. >> >> It should be easily reproducible on x60 with latest bios, it is 100% >> reproducible for me... > > So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ? > I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any difference. > We've had lots of issues with coalescing misbehavior. Not this bad (ie 1 second) though. > > Add this to modprobe.conf and reload e1000 module > > options e1000 RxIntDelay=0,0 RxAbsIntDelay=0,0 InterruptThrottleRate=0,0 TxIntDelay=0,0 TxAbsIntDelay=0,0 that can't be the problem. irq moderation would only account for 2-3ms variance maximum. Pavel, can you send me the `lspci -vvv` of your machine with the very latest git tree and after it's showing the poor ping performance? Auke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/