Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-214357-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bhavya
 Kapoor <b-kapoor@ti.com>
CC: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>, <kristo@kernel.org>,
        <nm@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-evm: Add support for multiple CAN instances
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 10:45:02 +0530
Message-ID: <171826022273.240984.17865327503994572008.b4-ty@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240411201747.18697-1-b-kapoor@ti.com>
References: <20240411201747.18697-1-b-kapoor@ti.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Bhavya Kapoor,

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 01:47:47 +0530, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
> CAN instances 0 and 1 in the mcu domain and 16 in the main domain are
> brought on the evm through headers J42, J43 and J46 respectively. Thus,
> add their respective transceiver's 0, 1 and 2 dt nodes to add support
> for these CAN instances.
> 
> CAN instance 4 in the main domain is brought on the evm through header
> J45. The CAN High and Low lines from the SoC are routed through a mux
> on the evm. The select lines need to be set for the CAN signals to
> reach to its transceiver on the evm. Therefore, add transceiver 3
> dt node to add support for this CAN instance.
> 
> [...]

I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-dts-next on [1].
Thank you!

[1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-evm: Add support for multiple CAN instances
      commit: 4b5156e1a413eaa2094b3281d6ea4e6b31cea01b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
--
Vignesh