Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-214511-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 09:12:24 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	Ryan Walklin <ryan@testtoast.com>,
	Chris Morgan <macroalpha82@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] regulator: axp20x: AXP717: fix LDO supply rails
 and off-by-ones
Message-ID: <20240614081224.GD2561462@google.com>
References: <20240418000736.24338-1-andre.przywara@arm.com>
 <20240418000736.24338-3-andre.przywara@arm.com>
 <f685b49a-36b1-46c9-a0a3-734bca8bd968@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <f685b49a-36b1-46c9-a0a3-734bca8bd968@arm.com>

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Andre Przywara wrote:

> Hi Broonie,
> 
> On 18/04/2024 01:07, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > The X-Powers AXP717 PMIC has separate input supply pins for each group
> > of LDOs, so they are not all using the same DCDC1 input, as described
> > currently.
> > 
> > Replace the "supply" member of each LDO description with the respective
> > group supply name, so that the supply dependencies can be correctly
> > described in the devicetree.
> > 
> > Also fix two off-by-ones in the regulator macros, after some double
> > checking the numbers against the datasheet. This uncovered a bug in the
> > datasheet: add a comment to document this.
> > 
> > Fixes: d2ac3df75c3a ("regulator: axp20x: add support for the AXP717")
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> 
> Can you please take (at least) this one patch as a fix for 6.10? Applies
> cleanly on top of v6.10-rc3. The changes are not super-critical, but worth
> fixing nevertheless.

FWIW, I have no idea what's going on with this set now.

Once all of the necessary patches have been expedited, please gather
together what's left and I'll take them via MFD.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]