Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-215218-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 17:17:08 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, aconole@redhat.com, echaudro@redhat.com,
	i.maximets@ovn.org, dev@openvswitch.org,
	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 7/9] net: openvswitch: do not notify drops
 inside sample
Message-ID: <20240614161708.GU8447@kernel.org>
References: <20240603185647.2310748-1-amorenoz@redhat.com>
 <20240603185647.2310748-8-amorenoz@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240603185647.2310748-8-amorenoz@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 08:56:41PM +0200, Adrian Moreno wrote:
> The OVS_ACTION_ATTR_SAMPLE action is, in essence,
> observability-oriented.
> 
> Apart from some corner case in which it's used a replacement of clone()
> for old kernels, it's really only used for sFlow, IPFIX and now,
> local emit_sample.
> 
> With this in mind, it doesn't make much sense to report
> OVS_DROP_LAST_ACTION inside sample actions.
> 
> For instance, if the flow:
> 
>   actions:sample(..,emit_sample(..)),2
> 
> triggers a OVS_DROP_LAST_ACTION skb drop event, it would be extremely
> confusing for users since the packet did reach its destination.
> 
> This patch makes internal action execution silently consume the skb
> instead of notifying a drop for this case.
> 
> Unfortunately, this patch does not remove all potential sources of
> confusion since, if the sample action itself is the last action, e.g:
> 
>     actions:sample(..,emit_sample(..))
> 
> we actually _should_ generate a OVS_DROP_LAST_ACTION event, but we aren't.
> 
> Sadly, this case is difficult to solve without breaking the
> optimization by which the skb is not cloned on last sample actions.
> But, given explicit drop actions are now supported, OVS can just add one
> after the last sample() and rewrite the flow as:
> 
>     actions:sample(..,emit_sample(..)),drop
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>