Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:21:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:21:01 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:32004 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:20:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:20:20 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Rik van Riel Cc: brownfld@irridia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable Message-Id: <20020107152020.6e8d07a4.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 00:22:09 -0200 (BRST) Rik van Riel wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > > > I am pretty impressed by Martins test case where merely all VM patches > > > fail with the exception of his own :-) > > > > No big wonder if both -aa and -rmap only get tested without swap ;) > > To be clear ... -aa and -rmap should of course also work > nicely without swap, no excuses for the bad behaviour > shown in Martin's test, but at the moment they simply > don't seem tuned for it. Good to hear we agree it _should_ work. When does it (rmap)? ;-) Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/