Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933701AbYBGVvY (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:51:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757506AbYBGVvL (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:51:11 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:11236 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757109AbYBGVvJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:51:09 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GaLUnHZ4Uf7BIR0KBPbJQ/S1Ab/7x/L4gCNWwF02xXYaEVqUEE4bk5EC5Atd1JGAgXYr7Lrvj3jk8/3X7gt6GbUGJ0nK2RvxwJH5d2ob0b5LIg18vIqjZfFwWJAH2E+OS4tE7Hoy3JYoB+Y4p9+8uVcvHMdJ+zd/1vOlJfnSE5Q= Message-ID: <47AB7D48.2020805@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:51:04 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Copeland , Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Nick Kossifidis Subject: Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test References: <20080206014131.9d489a34.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1202294560-7313-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> <20080206150043.GA6921@nineveh.local> <20080207212529.GA5975@dose.home.local> In-Reply-To: <20080207212529.GA5975@dose.home.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1673 Lines: 36 On 02/07/2008 10:25 PM, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:46:39 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: >>>> We failed to resume after a hardware reset here for a whole second. Is there any >>>> version of ath5k which worked for you (is this a regression)? >>> I cannot speak for Tino, but my ath5k never worked in MacBook -- it >>> failed the same way, and I believe the hardware was the same. My >>> understanding was that it was a known bug with PCIE devices, but I got >>> that out of reading list archives. >> Nick Kossifidis and I are in the process of debugging this -- we >> determined that AR5K_RESET_CTL_PCI hangs the card in hw_nic_wakeup. >> It doesn't look like there is any general support for 5424 cards yet. Seems hold for this case too, as Bob noted. > I tried the patch, and the card was detected. I was able to associate > with an WPA2 AP and send/receive some traffic. But after a while the > interface broke: > > ath0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:14:bf:16:25:87 - assume out of > range > ath5k_hw_get_isr: 0x00000020 > ... > ath0: failed to set channel 165 (5825 MHz) for scan > ath0: failed to restore operational channel after scan > printk: 19 messages suppressed. > ath5k phy0: calibration timeout (2447MHz) > printk: 1 messages suppressed. > ath5k phy0: calibration timeout (2447MHz) > ath5k phy0: unable to reset hardware: -11 What's the srev a phy ver printed few lines above this, please? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/