Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934257AbYBGWYO (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:24:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755703AbYBGWX6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:23:58 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:37258 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755206AbYBGWX5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:23:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:24:11 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: "Kok, Auke" Cc: kernel list , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, john.ronciak@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem Message-ID: <20080207222411.GA1917@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20080207141718.GA2030@elf.ucw.cz> <47AB4B2E.1030801@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47AB4B2E.1030801@intel.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1373 Lines: 33 Hi! > > I have the famous e1000 latency problems: > > > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=71 ttl=56 time=308.9 ms > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=72 ttl=56 time=305.4 ms > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=73 ttl=56 time=9.8 ms > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=74 ttl=56 time=3.7 ms > > > > ...and they are still there in 2.6.25-git0. I had ethernet EEPROM > > checksum problems, which I fixed by the update, but problems are not > > gone. > > pavel, start using "e1000e" instead - this driver replaces e1000 for all the > pci-express devices and has the infamous L1 ASPM disable patch to > fix this issue. Ok, e1000e seems to work for me. In another email, you asked for lspci -vvvv of failing e1000 case. Should I still provide it? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/