Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:13:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:13:20 -0500 Received: from mail3.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.38]:61199 "EHLO mail3.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:13:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:13:10 -0800 (PST) From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" To: linux kernel Subject: Re: swapping,any updates ?? Just wasted money on mem upgrade performance still suck :-( In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > knobs. It just won't happen. Fixing VM behavior is the only way. It has to > > work satisfactorily _without_ tuning. > > Thats something you will never achieve. Virtual memory is about heuristics, > crystal ball gazing and guesswork. There are always some workloads where you > want little caching and some where you want lots of caching - such as a > fileserver. > > You can make it right for most people but the last few percent you > will always get by tuning knobs - either directly or via GUI tools like > powertweak Thank you, Alan!! Now if the *other* kernel developers would just buy into this. :) -- M. Edward "Give me tuning knobs or give me death" Borasky znmeb@borasky-research.net http://www.borasky-research.net "The Few! The Proud! The Tweakers!" The American people are tired of being told what the American people are tired of. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/