Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:20:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:20:42 -0500 Received: from coffee.psychology.McMaster.CA ([130.113.218.59]:52123 "EHLO coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:20:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:21:04 -0500 (EST) From: Mark Hahn X-X-Sender: To: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" cc: linux kernel Subject: Re: swapping,any updates ?? Just wasted money on mem upgrade performance still suck :-( In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > knobs. It just won't happen. Fixing VM behavior is the only way. It has to > > > work satisfactorily _without_ tuning. > > > > Thats something you will never achieve. Virtual memory is about heuristics, > > crystal ball gazing and guesswork. There are always some workloads where you > > want little caching and some where you want lots of caching - such as a > > fileserver. non sequitur: Linus would like an adaptive VM, which recognizes apps with the properties you describe. there's no theoretical or practical reason this cannot be achieved. > Thank you, Alan!! Now if the *other* kernel developers would just buy > into this. :) you have the source. whinging about knobs is just whinging. all serious knobs require recompilation anyway. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/