DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=qEyovMtXZCUFs285LSFWZCElQTTwntgQN1LpUhpacVL9IU6JCVoN83DuzhdgpnXsz5C/MHyKSCaOqL1jIutNklwDyYRDq/tTte/m6MQjf3KJcOgV/bxVIcfYonmBUnziCy3mTqvTGIBHYJ+DL1VSj/vv6pX21jo52mOuk5MgwI8=
Message-ID: <84144f020802080907n268adc2bx7880b37919d61e78@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:07:11 +0200
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/patch-tags, one more time
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       torvalds@linux-foundation.org
In-Reply-To: <9525.1202489479@vena.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <9525.1202489479@vena.lwn.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 797
Lines: 18

Hi,

On Feb 8, 2008 6:51 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> Somebody recently asked me about this patch, so I dug it up for one last
> try.  I do believe there is value in describing patch tags, and,
> certainly, nobody has objected to the idea.  Comments from several
> reviewers were addressed before the previous posting.

Andrew, can we please get this patch merged? People seem to be abusing
"Signed-off-by" for these things so it would be nice to have it
documented in the official kernel tree. Thanks.

                         Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/