Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:02:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:02:39 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:21002 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:02:25 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:00:57 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alan Cox cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jaroslav Kysela , , , Subject: Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > Or we could just have a really _deep_ hierarchy, and put everything under > > "linux/drivers/sound/..", but I'd rather break cleanly with the old. > > Christoph has an interesting point. Networking is > > net/[protocol]/ > drivers/net/[driver] > > so by that logic we'd have > > sound/soundcore.c > sound/alsa/alsalibcode > sound/oss/osscore > > sound/drivers/cardfoo.c > > which would also be much cleaner since the supporting crap would be seperate > from the card drivers I would certainly not oppose that. Look sane to me, although the question then ends up being about "drivers/sound" or "sound/drivers" (the latter has the advantage that it keeps sound together, the former is more analogous to the "net" situation). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/