Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756972AbYBIErj (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:47:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753244AbYBIErc (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:47:32 -0500 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:2181 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752108AbYBIErc (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:47:32 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 05:47:18 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: john stultz cc: lkml , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH] correct inconsistent ntp interval/tick_length usage In-Reply-To: <1202523452.6174.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <1201142334.6383.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1201573686.6766.13.camel@localhost> <1201659263.6766.40.camel@localhost> <1201745776.6195.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1201914175.6216.46.camel@jstultz-laptop> <1202523452.6174.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 736 Lines: 22 Hi, On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, john stultz wrote: > > clock = clocksource_get_next(); > - clocksource_calculate_interval(clock, > - (unsigned long)(current_tick_length()>>TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT)); > + clocksource_calculate_interval(clock, NTP_INTERVAL_LENGTH); > clock->cycle_last = clocksource_read(clock); > Only now I noticed that the first patch had been merged without any further question. :-( What point is there in reviewing patches, if everything is merged anyway. :-( bye, Roman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/