Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756156AbYBILHS (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:07:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751817AbYBILHF (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:07:05 -0500 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:51668 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751259AbYBILHD (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:07:03 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:06:37 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Prakash Punnoor cc: Andi Kleen , mingo@elte.hu, lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace nvidia timer override quirk with pci id list In-Reply-To: <200802090008.05430.prakash@punnoor.de> Message-ID: References: <20080207195519.GA21772@basil.nowhere.org> <200802082000.39919.prakash@punnoor.de> <20080208210258.GA13058@one.firstfloor.org> <200802090008.05430.prakash@punnoor.de> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1791 Lines: 44 On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:00:39PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > > On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written: > > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:39:17PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yes, confirmed. timer w/o the skipping stays XT-PIC on nforce2. > > > > > > > > Confirmed what? Did you test my patch on both machines? > > > > What was the result? > > > > > > I confirmed that it (nforce2) needed the acpi_skip_timer_override. If you > > > read my mail, you knew I didn't test your patch. > > > > Ok can you please do so then? Or stop your obstructism? > > Grr, I don't know why I am discussing with stubborn and/or arrogant devs like > you seem to be. But I actually did what you wanted and as *expected* - as I > said I understand that trivial piece of code you posted - your patch fails > here for my nforce2: No worry, this patch wont go anywhere near mainline as long as it breaks stuff and obviously you are under no obligation to re-test patches that have not been changed just re-submitted. x86 changes, which are considered for mainline are staged in the mm branch of the x86 git tree: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=shortlog;h=mm Instructions for checking it out are here: http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README Please let us know, if there is anything which breaks your box(en). Thanks for your feedback and patience. tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/