Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755711AbYBIR4d (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:56:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752135AbYBIR4Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:56:25 -0500 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.172]:23064 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751373AbYBIR4Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:56:24 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=miQ1XY6qunDKQ52W3YHNoRPnyjE5lSQXsAab3DsQ7zztyIxTQAigXJJ/Qs6SNlP4vHh1Ewu7Z3Ie3UIjoEI30coko7o3nWasWtLKUmYYYCKhvU+qcR4gWr25vH1HL2ARzCvoaO0Vpb9PR0vQs1VqAPArrlfiiP8G4iiEBRa0slk= Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0802090956r2de999fap7f16e173858be240@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:56:23 -0500 From: "Mike Frysinger" To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables. Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Andrew Morton" In-Reply-To: <1202554574.8936.15.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200802081902.m18J2nOm005840@hera.kernel.org> <20080208230433.GA8524@elte.hu> <20080208231506.GA13350@elte.hu> <1202551589.8936.1.camel@localhost> <20080209103728.GA29375@elte.hu> <1202554574.8936.15.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 933 Lines: 19 On Feb 9, 2008 5:56 AM, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > i think the worst is over already and i'm reasonably sure that there are > > no more bugs in it - this _is_ a 1:1 patch after all, so in theory the > > worst side-effect should be build breakages due to include file > > spaghetti. The window for this particular breakage was just 256 commits, > > that's OK i think. > > Except for the breakage of all nommu architectures .. they need the > pgtable_t as well due to the pte_fn_t type. so why wasnt this in the original patch ? why do no-mmu arches have to add the pgtable_t typedefs themselves ? -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/