Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756840AbYBIUCk (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:02:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755318AbYBIUCa (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:02:30 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:62254 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755313AbYBIUC3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:02:29 -0500 From: Martin Rogge To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: e1000 1sec latency problem Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:00:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200802091107.27284.marogge@onlinehome.de> In-Reply-To: <200802091107.27284.marogge@onlinehome.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802092100.04631.marogge@onlinehome.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18ALs43O06+U5rnue95sHgoUAcJgBmN2AmKpXs zvvP/WF4xeHzGuGy5GnSynh59pRdEvb7ABMY2qHdYUxj50n+i+ 9yTKquJ5I/kvGoP1xvMD8IQ4izaZzG8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4094 Lines: 114 On Saturday 09 February 2008 11:07:26 Martin Rogge wrote: > Hi, > > I am not so familiar with the various mailing lists and missed out on > e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net the first time. Please cc me on any > replies. > > I am looking for help with either making the e1000e driver work on my > Thinkpad T60 or fixing the 1s latency issue with e1000. > > To be honest, I do not understand why the e1000e driver failed to recognize > the NIC when I tried. At least, I noticed the correct device ID is defined > in drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h: > > #define E1000_DEV_ID_82573L 0x109A > > Any help is appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Martin > > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > > Subject: Re: e1000 1sec latency problem > Date: Thursday 07 February 2008 > From: Martin Rogge > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I have the famous e1000 latency problems: > > Hi, I have the same problem with my Thinkpad T60. > > root@zorro:~# ping arnold > PING arnold (192.168.158.6) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=49.7 ms > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.438 ms > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1000 ms > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.970 ms > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=885 ms > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.484 ms > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=529 ms > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1.02 ms > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=149 ms > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.549 ms > 64 bytes from arnold (192.168.158.6): icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.829 ms > > --- arnold ping statistics --- > 11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 9999ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.438/238.113/1000.967/365.279 ms, pipe 2 > root@zorro:~# uname -a > Linux zorro 2.6.24 #6 SMP PREEMPT Sun Feb 3 18:27:48 CET 2008 i686 Intel(R) > Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux > root@zorro:~# lspci -vvv [stuff deleted] > Unfortunately the e1000e driver is not an option as it will not detect the > NIC: > > ----from dmesg with e1000 compiled in: > Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.3.20-k2-NAPI > Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation. > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 > PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:02:00.0 to 64 > e1000: 0000:02:00.0: e1000_probe: (PCI Express:2.5Gb/s:Width x1) > 00:15:58:c3:3a:71 > e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection > > ----from dmesg with e1000e compiled in: > e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 0.2.0 > e1000e: Copyright (c) 1999-2007 Intel Corporation. > > Any pointers? > > Thanks, > > Martin > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- Just for the records, I googled the following solution for the Lenovo T60: (a) use the e1000 driver (b) if compiling as a module, add the following parameter to modprobe.conf: options e1000 RxIntDelay=5 (c) if compiling a static driver, use the following patch (based on 2.6.24): --- e1000_param.c.orig 2008-01-24 23:58:37.000000000 +0100 +++ e1000_param.c 2008-02-09 20:42:23.000000000 +0100 @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ * Valid Range: 0-65535 */ E1000_PARAM(RxIntDelay, "Receive Interrupt Delay"); -#define DEFAULT_RDTR 0 +#define DEFAULT_RDTR 5 #define MAX_RXDELAY 0xFFFF #define MIN_RXDELAY 0 After reboot, the average ping time is still factor 10 worse than it should be, but it stays below 2 ms (which is a remarkable improvement compared to 1000 ms). Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/