Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:59:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:59:00 -0500 Received: from florence.ie.alphyra.com ([193.120.224.170]:61083 "EHLO florence.ie.alphyra.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:58:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:58:25 +0000 (GMT) From: Paul Jakma X-X-Sender: To: Dave Jones cc: Richard Gooch , Patrick Mochel , Subject: Re: Hardware Inventory [was: Re: ISA slot detection on PCI systems?] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Dave Jones wrote: > For one, driverfs can be made mandatory. Sure we could do the same for > devfs, but there are probably an army of people who don't want > a mandatory devfs. but devfs internally is a driver API for registering stuff. it can be made mandatory without requiring the user-side interface, ie /dev dir, to be mandatory. (indeed, i dont mount devfs on /dev). obviously devfs must also be made to pass Al's goodness-o-meter. :) in terms of the kernel interface it'd be daft to have multiple device registration interfaces. --paulj - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/