Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:23:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:22:52 -0500 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:11526 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:22:39 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: pwd@mdtsoft.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update to the make rpm system kernel 2.4.17 and 2.5.1 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jan 2002 13:07:10 CDT." <200201071807.g07I7AL08968@mdtsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 07:22:27 +1100 Message-ID: <433.1010434947@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:07:10 -0500 (EST), pwd@mdtsoft.com wrote: >That said it looks like the best thing for me to do might be to move the "make rpm" >function out of the Makefile and into a seperate script when kbuild 2.5 is >made live in the main line. The rpm build does not use the make system to >build first phase and after that is under the control of RPM itself. >I assume that the xconfig, oldconfig, config and mconfig are present in >kbuild 2.5? Not mconfig, kbuild 2.4 contains the existing 2.4 CML1 targets plus the new targets from CML2. >What is the correct method to tell if 2.5 is live? grep CONFIG_KBUILD_2_5=y .config - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/