Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757640AbYBJJSL (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:18:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752200AbYBJJRy (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:17:54 -0500 Received: from mtagate3.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.152]:17177 "EHLO mtagate3.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751708AbYBJJRv (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:17:51 -0500 Subject: Re: CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables. From: Martin Schwidefsky Reply-To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com To: Mike Frysinger Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0802090956r2de999fap7f16e173858be240@mail.gmail.com> References: <200802081902.m18J2nOm005840@hera.kernel.org> <20080208230433.GA8524@elte.hu> <20080208231506.GA13350@elte.hu> <1202551589.8936.1.camel@localhost> <20080209103728.GA29375@elte.hu> <1202554574.8936.15.camel@localhost> <8bd0f97a0802090956r2de999fap7f16e173858be240@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Corporation Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:17:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1202635061.21652.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1554 Lines: 35 On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 12:56 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Feb 9, 2008 5:56 AM, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > i think the worst is over already and i'm reasonably sure that there are > > > no more bugs in it - this _is_ a 1:1 patch after all, so in theory the > > > worst side-effect should be build breakages due to include file > > > spaghetti. The window for this particular breakage was just 256 commits, > > > that's OK i think. > > > > Except for the breakage of all nommu architectures .. they need the > > pgtable_t as well due to the pte_fn_t type. > > so why wasnt this in the original patch ? why do no-mmu arches have > to add the pgtable_t typedefs themselves ? I do cross-compiles for some architectures but not all. None of the nommu architectures are covered (I should change that). I actually did cross compile m68knommu for the first versions of the patch, that didn't went to well because of the standard m68k compiler. The pte_fn_t change has been added after the test compile for m68knommu. This is how is slipped through my fingers. The problem wasn't noticed either while the patch has been aging in Andrews -mm tree. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/