Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757077AbYBKPxX (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:53:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754815AbYBKPxQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:53:16 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45850 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754540AbYBKPxP (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:53:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:45:12 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Matthew Keenan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.22.18 Message-ID: <20080211154512.GA26178@suse.de> References: <20080211074313.GA23195@kroah.com> <20080211074346.GB23195@kroah.com> <1202729485.24584.5.camel@bazbox.opcode-solutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1202729485.24584.5.camel@bazbox.opcode-solutions.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1408 Lines: 46 On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:31:25AM +0000, Matthew Keenan wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 23:43 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > index 6a949eb..99c5e87 100644 > > --- a/Makefile > > +++ b/Makefile > > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > > VERSION = 2 > > PATCHLEVEL = 6 > > SUBLEVEL = 22 > > -EXTRAVERSION = .17 > > +EXTRAVERSION = .18 > > NAME = Holy Dancing Manatees, Batman! > > > > # *DOCUMENTATION* > > diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c > > index e263d3b..dbbe267 100644 > > --- a/fs/splice.c > > +++ b/fs/splice.c > > @@ -1182,6 +1182,9 @@ static int get_iovec_page_array(const struct iovec __user *iov, > > if (unlikely(!base)) > > break; > > > > + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, base, len)) > > + break; > > + > > /* > > * Get this base offset and number of pages, then map > > * in the user pages. > > Maybe I'm missing something here, but is there are reason that the patch > for 2.6.22 differs from 2.6.2[34]? The "if(unlikely(!base))" is removed > in the latter. the logic is a little different in 2.6.22 and earlier in regards to this area of code. This way we are safer. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/