Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:06:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:06:14 -0500 Received: from mail.vr-web.de ([195.243.197.42]:54031 "HELO mail.VR-Web.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:06:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:58:53 +0100 (CET) From: Matthias Hanisch To: Carl Scarfoglio cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.2-pre9 - HD performance degradation In-Reply-To: <3C3A0E04.9020909@arpacoop.it> Message-ID: Organization: Matze at his stone-old Linux Box MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Carl Scarfoglio wrote: > I ran hdparm -t on my disks and discovered an abysmal drop in hard disk > performance since 2.5.2-pre1. Yesterday I ran fsck on all disks and it > took more than three times as much to complete under 2.5.2-pre9 than > usual. I am running SuSE 6.3, MB is Asus A7v, controller ATA 33 + > Promise PDC 20265. > These are the results for a disk, (ATA 100 IBM 307030),for the other > disks they are pretty the same. > Resuslts for "hdpam -t /dev/hdg" > Kernel 2.5.2-pre1 - 35 MB/sec > Kernel 2.5.2-pre4 - 15 MB/sec > Kernel 2.5.2-pre9 - 10 MB/sec > For the rest, it seems pretty stable, but I still get kernel panic on > cold boots from the AHA 2904 (AIC7850). > Cheers, > Carlo Scarfoglio Could be scheduler related. Please try the fresh fix from Davide: > In sched.c::init_idle() : > > current->dyn_prio = -100; > > Let me know. For more info, see also the related thread here in LKML: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=101019244200001&r=1&w=2&n=12 Matze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/