Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759364AbYBKQrw (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:47:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758980AbYBKQr3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:47:29 -0500 Received: from g4t0014.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.17]:36207 "EHLO g4t0014.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759241AbYBKQr1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:47:27 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3 From: Lee Schermerhorn To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Linus Torvalds , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Paul Jackson , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman , linux-mm , Eric Whitney In-Reply-To: References: <20080205163406.270B.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <1202499913.5346.60.camel@localhost> <20080210141154.25E7.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080210054953.GA10371@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: HP/OSLO Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:47:39 -0500 Message-Id: <1202748459.5014.50.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1342 Lines: 35 On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 23:42 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Once the patch goes into Linus's tree, feel free to send it to the > > stable@kernel.org address so that we can include it in the 2.6.24.x > > tree. > > I've been ignoring the patches because they say "PATCH 2.6.24-mm1", and so > I simply don't know whether it's supposed to go into *my* kernel or just > -mm. > > There's also been several versions and discussions, so I'd really like to > have somebody send me a final patch with all the acks etc.. One that is > clearly for me, not for -mm. > Kosaki-san: You've tested V3 on '.24. Do you want to repost the patch refreshed against .24, adding your "Tested-by:" [and "Signed-off-by:", as the folding of the contextualization into mpol_check_policy() is based on your code--apologies for not adding it myself]? I'm tied up with something else for most of this week and won't get to it until Friday, earliest. Regards, Lee P.S., As Andrew pointed out, I forgot to run checkpatch and the patch does include a violation thereof. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/