Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764288AbYBLQuq (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:50:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762060AbYBLQug (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:50:36 -0500 Received: from bzq-219-195-70.pop.bezeqint.net ([62.219.195.70]:46155 "EHLO bh-buildlin1.bhalevy.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754529AbYBLQue (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:50:34 -0500 Message-ID: <47B1CD75.6070505@panasas.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:46:45 +0200 From: Benny Halevy Organization: Panasas, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: David Miller , arjan@infradead.org, greg@kroah.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) References: <20080211203146.3d28d1a0@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20080212044314.GA4888@kroah.com> <20080211211751.3e265754@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20080211.221126.230471463.davem@davemloft.net> <47B1CB08.4020101@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: <47B1CB08.4020101@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1770 Lines: 47 On Feb. 12, 2008, 18:36 +0200, Jeff Garzik wrote: > David Miller wrote: >> This is why, with the networking, we've just tossed all of the network >> driver stuff in there too. I can rebase freely, remove changesets, >> rework them, etc. and this causes a very low amount of pain for Jeff >> Garzik and John Linville. > > > s/very low/not low/ > > Rebasing is always a pain, and John and I both agreed the other day that > you do it too often. > > I've complained about this before, too... but figured this was just > another thing I was getting ignored on, and so life moved on. But don't > try to sell rebasing as "low pain". > > Rebasing makes the history all nice and pretty, but by totalling > flattening the history, trashing all the commit ids (and rewriting > associated metadata), you create obvious downstream problems. FWIW, when I rebase branches in my tree that others depend on I keep tags on the old heads for reference. Once the work-in-progress is done (e.g. tree pulled upstream) the reference tags can be cleaned up and the tree can be pruned. Benny > > Rebasing is low impact only if you don't have git downstream people. > Otherwise, you're just treating it as a useful quilt clone, really. > > Jeff > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/