Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763704AbYBLRxc (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:53:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760594AbYBLRxY (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:53:24 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:37558 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759351AbYBLRxW (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:53:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:51:09 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Roland Dreier Cc: Jeff Garzik , Stephen Rothwell , LKML , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Subject: Re: multiple drivers, single device Message-ID: <20080212175109.GA2114@kroah.com> References: <20080212120208.f7168a91.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080212042133.GA4625@kroah.com> <47B1C829.8020800@garzik.org> <20080212164232.GA326@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1342 Lines: 29 On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:42:20AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > > The work I'm doing here is for stupid PCI firmware engineers, who have > > created devices that are different things, all bound up under the same > > PCI device. I'm thinking of watchdog timers and random number > > generator and i2c controller on the same PCI device, or even the more > > basic, frame buffer and DRM access to the same PCI video device. > > > > The OLPC is a good example of hardware that needs this kind of > > functionality. > > Sounds interesting. I've been meaning to work on this too for quite a > while, but I'm glad to see you beat me to it. > > An example of an in-tree use case for this would be the mlx4 drivers-- > you can look at drivers/net/mlx4/intf.c to see the simple stupid > solution I came up with to allow an IB and a NIC (not yet upstream) > driver to share the same PCI device. A good test for your stuff would > be if it simplifies the code from the ad hoc solution I came up with. Great, I'll look into that as I need a test case for this kind of stuff. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/