Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762921AbYBLSJA (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:09:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754843AbYBLSIv (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:08:51 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:58889 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756203AbYBLSIt (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:08:49 -0500 Message-ID: <47B1E0AE.6060806@garzik.org> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:08:46 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Dreier CC: Greg KH , Stephen Rothwell , LKML , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Subject: Re: multiple drivers, single device References: <20080212120208.f7168a91.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080212042133.GA4625@kroah.com> <47B1C829.8020800@garzik.org> <20080212164232.GA326@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.3 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1357 Lines: 31 Roland Dreier wrote: > > The work I'm doing here is for stupid PCI firmware engineers, who have > > created devices that are different things, all bound up under the same > > PCI device. I'm thinking of watchdog timers and random number > > generator and i2c controller on the same PCI device, or even the more > > basic, frame buffer and DRM access to the same PCI video device. > > > > The OLPC is a good example of hardware that needs this kind of > > functionality. > > Sounds interesting. I've been meaning to work on this too for quite a > while, but I'm glad to see you beat me to it. > > An example of an in-tree use case for this would be the mlx4 drivers-- > you can look at drivers/net/mlx4/intf.c to see the simple stupid > solution I came up with to allow an IB and a NIC (not yet upstream) > driver to share the same PCI device. A good test for your stuff would > be if it simplifies the code from the ad hoc solution I came up with. Our APIs are written such that the PCI device probe function is the starting point for registering IB and NIC. No need for anything new. Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/