From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
To: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wferi@niif.hu
Subject: Re: currently active Linux kernel versions
References: <87skzx53a9.fsf@szonett.ki.iif.hu>
	<1202850783.6697.0.camel@bip.parateam.prv>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:18:48 +0100
In-Reply-To: <1202850783.6697.0.camel@bip.parateam.prv> (Xavier Bestel's
	message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:13:03 +0100")
Message-ID: <87wsp9q3ev.fsf@szonett.ki.iif.hu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1020
Lines: 25

Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr> writes:

> On mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> 
>> which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in
>> time?  The quote is taken from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/29.
>> Or more precisely: which are the "stable" versions I can depend on for
>> a more or less critical server, those that have active security
>> support or receive at least critical bugfixes?  I know about the
>> 2.6.2[34].y stable git trees, but I wonder how long will those receive
>> attention (that is, security fixes).  Can I find a written policy
>> somewhere?
>
> The answer is at http://kernel.org/

Not quite, at least I can't find 2.6.23.y there, even though that
branch seems to be maintained...
-- 
Thanks,
Feri.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/