Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753288AbYBLVg6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:36:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751469AbYBLVgs (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:36:48 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:11540 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750879AbYBLVgr (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:36:47 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,341,1199692800"; d="scan'208";a="297968003" Message-ID: <47B210D3.3000006@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:34:11 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Christoph Hellwig , ananth@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, ak@suse.de, sam@ravnborg.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Create and populate toplevel tests/ for kernel tests References: <20080211104452.GB7944@in.ibm.com> <20080212164452.GA31096@infradead.org> <20080212132246.aac67ed1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080212132246.aac67ed1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1260 Lines: 28 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:44:52 -0500 > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:14:52PM +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: >>> The following series of patches create and populate the toplevel tests/ >>> directory. This will henceforth be the place where all in-kernel tests >>> live. >>> >>> All patches against 2.6.25-rc1 and are just code movement without any >>> change in functionality. >> ACK to patches 1-7, and I agree with Ingo that the x86-specific test >> should stay under arch/x86. > > OK. But now is basically the worst time for me (or anyone else) to merge > large code-motion changes like this, because they need to be carried for > two months or more. > alternatively, since it's just code motion and nothing more, it could just be done in 2.6.25-rc; in fact doing motion patches in the -rc2 window makes sense to me, that's the point where all external trees are the smallest, and it should be provably the same result.. so safe. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/