Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752287AbYBLViO (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:38:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751400AbYBLVh6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:37:58 -0500 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.186]:50169 "EHLO rn-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751393AbYBLVh5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:37:57 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=thNSgRWP8CVT15q8C+PTmhXBTilV8Oj8ScDsUtt63gTSp6vBgUkrRdpwotMny0SaQz0ZRBhHx56sRhkNrQINPYfjwixxed1tX1BESVD7S3ozLVX9/AaEA0o+DId1uUJ1ouw/nvT8EzuzOzQB/r/RkWdmBNsgMmfjEUnhvJ4RGDg= Message-ID: <170fa0d20802121337t35787cbby52286f5a08ea2e15@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:37:54 -0500 From: "Mike Snitzer" To: "Ferenc Wagner" Subject: Re: currently active Linux kernel versions Cc: "Xavier Bestel" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Willy Tarreau" In-Reply-To: <87wsp9q3ev.fsf@szonett.ki.iif.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <87skzx53a9.fsf@szonett.ki.iif.hu> <1202850783.6697.0.camel@bip.parateam.prv> <87wsp9q3ev.fsf@szonett.ki.iif.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1550 Lines: 34 On Feb 12, 2008 4:18 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Xavier Bestel writes: > > > On mar, 2008-02-12 at 21:27 +0100, Wagner Ferenc wrote: > > > >> which are the "currently active Linux kernel versions" at any point in > >> time? The quote is taken from http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/11/29. > >> Or more precisely: which are the "stable" versions I can depend on for > >> a more or less critical server, those that have active security > >> support or receive at least critical bugfixes? I know about the > >> 2.6.2[34].y stable git trees, but I wonder how long will those receive > >> attention (that is, security fixes). Can I find a written policy > >> somewhere? > > > > The answer is at http://kernel.org/ > > Not quite, at least I can't find 2.6.23.y there, even though that > branch seems to be maintained... 2.6.16.x is still maintained (2.6.16.60 was recently released). 2.6.22.x is still maintained but Greg KH is apparently going to be ending his duties on it after the next release or so. There is some confusion as to whether Willy Tarreau will be taking on the 2.6.22.x tree once Greg is done, Willy?: http://lwn.net/Articles/268003/ http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Stable_2.6_Branches 2.6.23.x and 2.6.24.x are obviously quite active for stable@kernel.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/