Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754142AbYBLW0k (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:26:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751903AbYBLW0a (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:26:30 -0500 Received: from g1t0029.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.36]:48823 "EHLO g1t0029.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752384AbYBLW03 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:26:29 -0500 Message-ID: <47B21D13.5060700@hp.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:26:27 -0500 From: "Alan D. Brunelle" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alan D. Brunelle" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , npiggin@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com, arjan@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: IO queueing and complete affinity w/ threads: Some results References: <47B0B69B.1050807@hp.com> <47B218E9.7040405@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <47B218E9.7040405@hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 767 Lines: 17 Alan D. Brunelle wrote: > > Hopefully, the first column is self-explanatory - these are the settings applied to the queue_affinity, completion_affinity and rq_affinity tunables. Due to the fact that the standard deviations are so large coupled with the very close average results, I'm not seeing anything in this set of tests to favor any of the combinations... > Note quite: Q or C = 0 really means Q or C set to -1 (default), Q or C = 1 means placing that thread on the CPU managing the IRQ. Sorry... Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/