Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759572AbYBMCrz (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:47:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753743AbYBMCrq (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:47:46 -0500 Received: from queueout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.33]:2069 "EHLO queueout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243AbYBMCrp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:47:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:43:29 +0000 From: Ken Moffat To: Greg KH Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, muli@il.ibm.com, jdmason@kudzu.us, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this? Message-ID: <20080213024329.GA6912@deepthought> References: <20080213001506.GA13933@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080213001506.GA13933@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=gcwBkTFKDvoA:10 a=9vzMQgj8eMJxLs+ya4Hk2A==:17 a=D3wefQSD8yZxRaRuTKEA:9 a=UhGMt6uKUyvYFXl5IXAA:7 a=vZsx1vOZ1RPvF74ws1X0okK0VsAA:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1559 Lines: 34 On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:15:07PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > I'm curious if we really still support the ide=reverse option? It's a > config option that I don't think the distros still enable (SuSE does > not). Is this still needed these days? > My "server" has a consumer-grade desktop amd64 mobo, with all that implies about cheap hardware and strange/misleading bios options. It also has an add-in dual IDE card with the main data on raid1. It's set to ide=reverse, without that it doesn't boot (the add-ins are IDE, system drive is SATA, so I guess it probably tries to boot from the DVD - it's been a long time since it bit me and I don't remember the full details. That was how it was set for 2.6.18.6, and how it now boots from 2.6.22.18. I think at one time the order of the interfaces might have been different. Certainly, I carry forward a fallback without ide=reverse in lilo.conf, just in case the disks move on my next kernel upgrade. What a distro selects should cover most of that distro's users, but that is not anywhere near providing 100% coverage for *all* the hardware out there. Also, you can force your users to e.g. mount by label. So far, that hasn't been forced on me, and I really hate having to reboot that box :) Ken -- das eine Mal als Trag?die, das andere Mal als Farce -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/