Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765700AbYBMGCp (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:02:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765027AbYBMGCM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:02:12 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:60059 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764861AbYBMGCJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:02:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:44:36 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Rene Herman Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, muli@il.ibm.com, jdmason@kudzu.us, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: "ide=reverse" do we still need this? Message-ID: <20080213044436.GB10101@kroah.com> References: <20080213001506.GA13933@kroah.com> <47B24AB3.3040009@keyaccess.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47B24AB3.3040009@keyaccess.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1427 Lines: 35 On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:41:07AM +0100, Rene Herman wrote: > On 13-02-08 01:15, Greg KH wrote: > >> I'm reworking the pci device list logic (we currently keep all PCI >> devices in 2 lists, which isn't the nicest, we should be able to get >> away with only 1 list.) >> The only bother I've found so far is the pci_get_device_reverse() >> function, it's used in 2 places, IDE and the calgary driver. >> I'm curious if we really still support the ide=reverse option? It's a >> config option that I don't think the distros still enable (SuSE does >> not). Is this still needed these days? >> In digging, we changed this option in 2.2.x from being called >> "pci=reverse" and no one else seems to miss it. >> Any thoughts? > > While details escape me somewhat again at the monment, a few months ago I > was playing around with a PCI Promise IDE controller and needed ide=reverse > to save me from having to switch disks around to still have a bootable > system. > > Or some such. Not too clear anymore, but I remember it saved the day. You couldn't just change the boot disk in grub? Or use an initramfs and /dev/disk/by-id/ to keep any future moves stable? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/