Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764098AbYBMG6W (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:58:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757390AbYBMG5z (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:57:55 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:60346 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756930AbYBMG5x (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:57:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:16:53 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Miller , jeff@garzik.org, arjan@infradead.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) Message-ID: <20080213061653.GA10784@kroah.com> References: <20080211211751.3e265754@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20080211.221126.230471463.davem@davemloft.net> <47B1CB08.4020101@garzik.org> <20080212.155853.193190548.davem@davemloft.net> <20080213002948.GA8899@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1706 Lines: 40 On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:49:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Perhaps you need to switch to using quilt. This is the main reason why > > I use it. > > Btw, on that note: if some quilt user can send an "annotated history file" > of their quilt usage, it's something that git really can do, and I'll see > if I can merge (or rather, coax Junio to merge) the relevant part of stgit > to make it possible to just basically get "quilt behaviour" for the parts > of a git tree that you haven't pushed out yet. Ted's description matches mine (keep quilt tree in git, edit changelog entries, rebase on newer kernel versions, etc.) I can go into details if needed. > A pure patch-stack will be faster at that thing than git would be (it's > simply easier to just track patches), but on the other hand, using git > would get some other advantages outside of the integration issue (eg the > cherry-pick thing really is a proper three-way merge, not just an "apply > patch", so it can do better). I was amazed at how slow stgit was when I tried it out. I use git-quiltimport a lot and I don't think it's any slower than just using quilt on its own. So I think that the speed issue should be the same. I had a number of issues last time I tried stgit out, but maybe they are now resolved, I'll try it out tomorrow and report to the git list anything I find that doesn't work for me. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/