Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765492AbYBMIKF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:10:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755571AbYBMIJy (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:09:54 -0500 Received: from alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de ([193.175.197.63]:54799 "EHLO alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754044AbYBMIJx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:09:53 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 818 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:09:52 EST X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.4.0 alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de m1D7sweI010889 To: Greg KH cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, muli@il.ibm.com, discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jdmason@kudzu.us, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz Subject: Re: [discuss] "ide=reverse" do we still need this? In-reply-to: <20080213001506.GA13933@kroah.com> References: <20080213001506.GA13933@kroah.com> Comments: In-reply-to Greg KH message dated "Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:15:07 -0800." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nmh 1.2; GNU Emacs 22.1.1 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:54:55 +0100 Message-ID: <1237.1202889295@sora.hank.home> From: Dirk GOUDERS Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1395 Lines: 33 Hi, > I'm reworking the pci device list logic (we currently keep all PCI > devices in 2 lists, which isn't the nicest, we should be able to get > away with only 1 list.) > > The only bother I've found so far is the pci_get_device_reverse() > function, it's used in 2 places, IDE and the calgary driver. > > I'm curious if we really still support the ide=reverse option? It's a > config option that I don't think the distros still enable (SuSE does > not). Is this still needed these days? > > In digging, we changed this option in 2.2.x from being called > "pci=reverse" and no one else seems to miss it. > > Any thoughts? I remember vaguely that some years ago, we set up a box with four IDE disks as a RAID set. For that purpose, we added a PCI ATA100 controller so that each disk could act as a primary IDE device and we were only able to boot the system with the option ide=reverse. That box has been replaced by some other so I cannot verify it but as far as I remember it was a problem with disk numbering between BIOS, bootloader and/or kernel. Also, at that time we used lilo and I am not sure if grub would have done better. Dirk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/