Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 05:38:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 05:38:04 -0500 Received: from smtp3.libero.it ([193.70.192.53]:13254 "EHLO smtp3.libero.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 05:37:59 -0500 Message-ID: <3C3ACBC8.E29CE1CB@alsa-project.org> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 11:36:56 +0100 From: Abramo Bagnara X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.17 i586) X-Accept-Language: en, it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: Takashi Iwai , Linus Torvalds , "J.A. Magallon" , Alan Cox , Alan Cox , Christoph Hellwig , "sound-hackers@zabbo.net" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [s-h] Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernel In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > Agreed. The hw specific header files should be bound with *.c code > > together. > > The problem is that we should export some header files to user space as > well to allow access to hardware related features. Don't you think it's better to split this in "external" headers (placed in include/sound together with asound.h) and "internal" ones (placed in drivers/*/)? To present kernel space struct layout for specific hardware to user space does not seem a lot sensible to me (and might also give some errors unless nasty #ifdef __KERNEL__ tricks). -- Abramo Bagnara mailto:abramo@alsa-project.org Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy ALSA project http://www.alsa-project.org It sounds good! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/